MACHINE PROCESS CAPABILITY, ITS IMPLICATIONS
Cp is a measure of the potential capability of a process, which is calculated by comparing the width of the process spread to the width of the specification limits. It indicates how well a process is centered within the specification limits and how much variability there is in the output.
Cpk, on the other hand, is a measure of the actual capability of a process, which takes into account both the centering of the process within the specification limits and the variability of the output. It is calculated by comparing the minimum of the difference between the process mean and the specification limits to the process variability.
In other words, Cp assumes that the process is centered within the specification limits, whereas Cpk considers both the centering and the variability of the process. Cpk is generally considered to be a more robust and informative measure of process capability, as it provides a more complete picture of how well a process is able to meet the specified tolerances.
Process Capability means: Voice of customer /Voice of Process
CPK = Min [(USL – mean/3 * std.),(mean-LSL/3*std.)] To calculate the CPK, take the minimum value of either of the following values. The upper limit minus the mean divided by 3 times the standard deviation or the mean minus the lower limit divided by 3 times the standard deviation
It's worth noting that both Cp and Cpk are used in conjunction with control charts and other statistical process control techniques to monitor and improve the performance of a process over time.
Important Note :
Cpk can never exceed Cp, so Cp can be seen as the potential Cpk if the overall average is centrally set. In the example, Cp is 1.17 and Cpk is 0.67.
This shows that the distribution can potentially fit within the specification. However, the overall average is currently off-center.
This process center may shift min 1.5 sigma to go off center during the course of time
Cpk cannot be used if the:
- Data is not a bell-shaped normal distribution
- The control chart is not in control and free from special causes.
It is recommended to have at least 25 subgroups and preferably each subgroup having >1 data point. The greater the subgroup's size the higher likelihood the special cause variation is detected and that it exists if it is detected.
BE Mech , MTech (Industrial Engg), PGD (Operations)
SRH MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS AND TRAINERS
Leading Innovative Strategy in Organization-USA
ISO Lead Auditor, Certified Quality Manager
Comments
Post a Comment